Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2207.00568

Hamiltonian gauge theory with corners: constraint reduction and flux superselection

Aldo Riello·Michele Schiavina
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study gauge theories on spacetime manifolds with a codimension-$1$ submanifold with boundary. We characterise the reduced phase space of the theory whenever it is described by a local momentum map for the action of the gauge group $\mathcal{G}$, by means of Fr\'echet reduction by stages. The momentum map decomposes into a bulk term called constraint map, defining a coisotropic constraint set, and a boundary term called flux map. In the first stage, constraint reduction, the constraint set is the zero of a momentum map for a normal subgroup $\mathcal{G}_\circ\subset\mathcal{G}$, called constraint gauge group. In the second stage, flux superselection, the flux map is the momentum map for the residual action of the flux gauge group $\underline{\mathcal{G}}\doteq\mathcal{G}/\mathcal{G}_\circ$, which also controls equivariance. The reduced phase space of the theory, when smooth, is then only a partial Poisson manifold $\underline{\underline{\mathcal{C}}}\simeq \underline{\mathcal{C}}/\underline{\mathcal{G}}$. Its symplectic leaves are called \emph{flux superselection sectors}, for they provide a classical analogue of, and a road map to, the phenomenon of quantum superselection. To corners, we further assign a symplectic Lie algebroid over a Poisson manifold, $\mathsf{A}_{\partial} \to \mathcal{P}_{\partial}$, and show how on-shell configurations $\mathcal{C}_{\partial}\subset\mathcal{P}_{\partial}$ are also Poisson. Both $\mathcal{C}_{\partial}$ and $\underline{\underline{\mathcal{C}}}$ fibrate over a common space of superselections, labeling the Casimirs of both Poisson structures. We showcase the formalism by explicitly working out the first and second stage reductions for a broad class of Yang--Mills theories, where $\underline{\underline{\mathcal{C}}}$ is found to be a Weinstein space, and discuss further applications to topological theories.

Explore related subjects

math-phhep-thmath.MPmath.SG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Aldo Riello, Michele Schiavina. 2022-07-01. Hamiltonian gauge theory with corners: constraint reduction and flux superselection. https://doi.org/10.4310/atmp.241029014101

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗