Realizability Makes a Difference: A Complexity Gap for Sink-Finding in USOs

Simon Weber; Joel Widmer

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2207.05985

Realizability Makes a Difference: A Complexity Gap for Sink-Finding in USOs

Simon Weber·Joel Widmer

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Algorithms for finding the sink in Unique Sink Orientations (USOs) of the hypercube can be used to solve many algebraic and geometric problems, most importantly including the P-Matrix Linear Complementarity Problem and Linear Programming. The realizable USOs are those that arise from the reductions of these problems to the USO sink-finding problem. Finding the sink of realizable USOs is thus highly practically relevant, yet it is unknown whether realizability can be exploited algorithmically to find the sink more quickly. However, all (non-trivial) known unconditional lower bounds for sink-finding make use of USOs that are provably not realizable. This indicates that the sink-finding problem might indeed be strictly easier on realizable USOs. In this paper we show that this is true for a subclass of all USOs. We consider the class of Matou\v{s}ek-type USOs, which are a translation of Matou\v{s}ek's LP-type problems into the language of USOs. We show a query complexity gap between sink-finding in all, and sink-finding in only the realizable $n$-dimensional Matou\v{s}ek-type USOs. We provide concrete deterministic algorithms and lower bounds for both cases, and show that in the realizable case $O(log^2 n)$ vertex evaluation queries suffice, while in general exactly $n$ queries are needed. The Matou\v{s}ek-type USOs are the first USO class found to admit such a gap.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.CC math.CO math.OC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Simon Weber, Joel Widmer. 2022-07-13. Realizability Makes a Difference: A Complexity Gap for Sink-Finding in USOs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.05985

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗