Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2207.08311

Shrunk subspaces via operator Sinkhorn iteration

Cole Franks·Tasuku Soma·Michel X. Goemans
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A recent breakthrough in Edmonds' problem showed that the noncommutative rank can be computed in deterministic polynomial time, and various algorithms for it were devised. However, only quite complicated algorithms are known for finding a so-called shrunk subspace, which acts as a dual certificate for the value of the noncommutative rank. In particular, the operator Sinkhorn algorithm, perhaps the simplest algorithm to compute the noncommutative rank with operator scaling, does not find a shrunk subspace. Finding a shrunk subspace plays a key role in applications, such as separation in the Brascamp-Lieb polytope, one-parameter subgroups in the null-cone membership problem, and primal-dual algorithms for matroid intersection and fractional matroid matching. In this paper, we provide a simple Sinkhorn-style algorithm to find the smallest shrunk subspace over the complex field in deterministic polynomial time. To this end, we introduce a generalization of the operator scaling problem, where the spectra of the marginals must be majorized by specified vectors. Then we design an efficient Sinkhorn-style algorithm for the generalized operator scaling problem. Applying this to the shrunk subspace problem, we show that a sufficiently long run of the algorithm also finds an approximate shrunk subspace close to the minimum exact shrunk subspace. Finally, we show that the approximate shrunk subspace can be rounded if it is sufficiently close. Along the way, we also provide a simple randomized algorithm to find the smallest shrunk subspace. As applications, we design a faster algorithm for fractional linear matroid matching and efficient weak membership and optimization algorithms for the rank-2 Brascamp-Lieb polytope.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cole Franks, Tasuku Soma, Michel X. Goemans. 2022-07-17. Shrunk subspaces via operator Sinkhorn iteration. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08311

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗