Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2207.08769

Numerical stability and tensor nuclear norm

Zhen Dai·Lek-Heng Lim
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present a notion of bilinear stability, which is to numerical stability what bilinear complexity is to time complexity. In bilinear complexity, an algorithm for evaluating a bilinear operator $β: \mathbb{U} \times \mathbb{V} \to \mathbb{W}$ is a decomposition $β= φ_1 \otimes ψ_1 \otimes w_1 + \dots + φ_r \otimes ψ_r \otimes w_r $; the number of terms $r$ captures the speed of the algorithm; and its smallest possible value, i.e., the tensor rank of $β$, quantifies the speed of a fastest algorithm. Bilinear stability introduces norms to the mix: The growth factor of the algorithm $\lVert φ_1 \rVert_* \lVert ψ_1 \rVert_* \lVert w_1 \rVert + \dots + \lVert φ_r \rVert_* \lVert ψ_r \rVert_* \lVert w_r \rVert$ captures the accuracy of the algorithm; and its smallest possible value, i.e., the tensor nuclear norm of $β$, quantifies the accuracy of a stablest algorithm. To substantiate this notion, we establish a bound for the forward error in terms of the growth factor and present numerical evidence comparing various fast algorithms for matrix and complex multiplications, showing that larger growth factors correlate with less accurate results. Compared to similar studies of numerical stability, bilinear stability is more general, applying to any bilinear operators and not just matrix or complex multiplications; is more simplistic, bounding forward error in terms of a single (growth) factor; and is truly tensorial like bilinear complexity, invariant under any orthogonal change of coordinates. As an aside, we study a new algorithm for computing complex multiplication in terms of real, much like Gauss's, but is optimally fast and stable in that it attains both tensor rank and nuclear norm.

Explore related subjects

math.NAcs.NA

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhen Dai, Lek-Heng Lim. 2023-10-12. Numerical stability and tensor nuclear norm. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08769

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Stress-divergence, Laplacian, and rotational forms of the incompressible Navier--Stokes equations with variable viscosity

In the Navier--Stokes equations, incompressibility allows rewriting the viscous term in various forms leading to distinct numerical properties and flow descriptions. Furthermore, models accounting for non-Newtonian, thermal or turbulent effects often break the constant-viscosity assumption, thereby producing additional consistency terms. In this context, the present work compares the classical symmetric-gradient diffusion term with more recent variable-viscosity generalizations of the Laplacian and rotational forms. We discuss, analyze and test their differences with respect to implementation, efficiency, numerical stability and outflow boundary conditions. With a focus on time-dependent flows, we consider second-order implicit-explicit (IMEX) temporal discretizations aimed at improving efficiency and numerical stability. Through a rigorous stability analysis, we show how selected explicit treatments can bypass algorithmic nonlinearities without inducing CFL conditions. Our numerical results highlight important differences between the three viscous formulations---especially in the presence of outflow boundaries, for which the generalized Laplacian form proves more suitable in diffusion-dominated regimes. %(as widely known for constant viscosity).

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

Full-window branch discovery and loss-selected EnKF continuation for data assimilation

We develop a framework for offline full-window branch discovery, optionally followed by online continuation with an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). Three mechanisms drive the branch search: adjoint path-kernel (APK) differentiation balances kernel differentiation and correction-stabilized path perturbation, shifting the optimization from exploration to exploitation; an optimized Gaussian initial law broadens the search over initial-state basins; and loss-weighted mixing across independent runs recombines successful path components. We may then select an interior state using a local loss and continue online with an EnKF. In 40-dimensional Lorenz-96 experiments, the mean offline path RMSE of APK is 4.3 times smaller than that of population weak-$\mathrm{4D\text{-}Var}_x$. The resulting APK-EnKF method has a mean online RMSE 64 times smaller than that of ordinary EnKF.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

A variational physics-informed graph neural network for heterogeneous solid mechanics

Stress localization in heterogeneous solids is governed by the bimaterial interface, where the displacement field remains $C^0$-continuous, while in-plane stresses jump due to the stiffness mismatch. Coordinate-based physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) represent this jump via a prescribed regularization width or a weighted interface penalty, making their accuracy sensitive to how phase-contrast changes are handled. This work presents a variational, label-free physics-informed graph neural network (PI-GNN) in which the heterogeneity is carried by the discretization rather than by the trial field. The solver operates on a conforming adaptive mesh graph, assigns constitutive behavior per element, and minimizes the discrete total potential energy as a single unweighted objective in which only first derivatives appear. The discrete energy on piecewise-linear elements coincides with the finite element (FE) Ritz functional. Dirichlet conditions are enforced by construction, with no penalty term, no interface weight, and no prescribed transition width. Using one fixed architecture, optimizer, and loss across small-strain elasticity and finite-strain Neo-Hookean hyperelasticity in two and three dimensions, the von Mises error remains below $3.58\%$ across a stiffness-contrast sweep spanning $(E_{\mathrm{inc}}/E_{\mathrm{mat}}\in[10^{-2},10^{2}])$, where a strong-form PINN degrades to $5.58\%$, and its displacement error reaches $7.66\%$ against $0.49\%$ for the PI-GNN. A trained network halves the ($\sigma_{xx}$) error of an energy-based PINN ($5.01\%$ versus $10.94\%$). Training cost exceeds a single FE solve by more than an order of magnitude, so the construction is a variationally consistent, penalty-free interface representation for parametric surrogates and inverse identification rather than a replacement for a one-off FE analysis.

math.NA↗