Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2207.12499

Interference and Need Aware Workload Colocation in Hyperscale Datacenters

Sayak Chakraborti·Brian Coutinho·Sandhya Dwarkadas·Parth Malani·Bikash Sharma
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Datacenters suffer from resource utilization inefficiencies due to the conflicting goals of service owners and platform providers. Service owners intending to maintain Service Level Objectives (SLO) for themselves typically request a conservative amount of resources. Platform providers want to increase operational efficiency to reduce capital and operating costs. Achieving both operational efficiency and SLO for individual services at the same time is challenging due to the diversity in service workload characteristics, resource usage patterns that are dependent on input load, heterogeneity in platform, memory, I/O, and network architecture, and resource bundling. This paper presents a tunable approach to resource allocation that accounts for both dynamic service resource needs and platform heterogeneity. In addition, an online K-Means-based service classification method is used in conjunction with an offline sensitivity component. Our tunable approach allows trading resource utilization efficiency for absolute SLO guarantees based on the service owners' sensitivity to its SLO. We evaluate our tunable resource allocator at scale in a private cloud environment with mostly latency-critical workloads. When tuning for operational efficiency, we demonstrate up to ~50% reduction in required machines; ~40% reduction in Total-Cost-of-Ownership (TCO); and ~60% reduction in CPU and memory fragmentation, but at the cost of increasing the number of tasks experiencing degradation of SLO by up to ~25% compared to the baseline. When tuning for SLO, by introducing interference-aware colocation, we can tune the solver to reduce tasks experiencing degradation of SLO by up to ~22% compared to the baseline, but at an additional cost of ~30% in terms of the number of hosts. We highlight this trade-off between TCO and SLO violations, and offer tuning based on the requirements of the platform owners.

Explore related subjects

cs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sayak Chakraborti, Brian Coutinho, Sandhya Dwarkadas, Parth Malani, Bikash Sharma. 2022-07-25. Interference and Need Aware Workload Colocation in Hyperscale Datacenters. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.12499

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Online Treasure Hunt in Vertex-Permuted Dynamic Rings

We study the problem of treasure hunt by a group of $k \geq 1$ agents in vertex-permuted dynamic rings (VP). In this model, the $n$ vertices remain on a ring but are permuted at each time step. We first show that treasure hunt is impossible for any $k \leq n-3$ agents, if there are no restrictions on the sequence of permutations used in the dynamic ring. We then study the $VP(\delta)$ setting, in which for every pair $i, j$ of vertices, the edge $(i, j)$ is guaranteed to appear within $\delta$ steps. We show that the class $VP(\delta)$ is feasible only for $\delta \geq \left\lceil \frac{n-1}{2}\right\rceil$. For the one-agent case, we show a tight bound of $\Theta(\delta n)$ on the worst-case search time as well as competitive ratio of any online algorithm for treasure hunt, provided $\delta \geq 2n$. We then give an optimal algorithm for $k$ agents, thereby showing that $k$ agents can obtain a speedup of $k$ on the worst-case search time. Finally, in the R-VP setting, in which in every step, the vertices are arranged as a ring according to a random permutation, we show that treasure hunt takes expected $\Theta(n)$ steps against an oblivious adversary and $\Theta(n \log n)$ steps against an adaptive adversary.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

The Computing Channel: How Modulation Programs the Airwaves

Distributed computing and distributed artificial intelligence require frequent exchanges of intermediate results, although many applications need only an aggregate rather than messages from individual devices. Conventional systems recover each message before computing the aggregate, whereas over-the-air computation (OAC) exploits simultaneous transmission to obtain it directly. However, dominant OAC implementations rely on analog signaling, creating a mismatch with finite-precision data and digital communication procedures. This article presents digital function-oriented communication, in which finite-alphabet symbol representations and receiver decisions are jointly designed so that multiple-access superposition encodes the desired function without recovering individual inputs. We introduce its computational-constellation principle, main design approaches, extensions, and implementation challenges. Federated edge learning illustrates how the framework can reduce user-dependent data-bearing resources while operating directly on quantized model updates.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

Can AI Remediate Backend Failures Safely? GuardedAct with Blast-Radius-Aware Sandboxing

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in generating remediation actions for microservice failures. However, directly executing AI-generated repair actions in production risks cascading collateral damage. We propose GuardedAct, a sandbox-first remediation framework that interposes a blast-radius-aware verification layer between the LLM action generator and the production environment. GuardedAct operates in four phases: (1) ingesting a diagnosis report together with the live system topology and recent telemetry, (2) prompting an LLM to produce a ranked list of candidate remediation actions, (3) simulating each action in a lightweight digital-twin sandbox that estimates the blast radius and assigns a risk label, and (4) enforcing a rollback-confidence gate that auto-executes only low-risk actions while escalating high-risk ones for human review. We evaluate GuardedAct on five fault scenarios injected into the DeathStarBench social-network application. Experimental results show that GuardedAct achieves an overall recovery rate of 87.4% while reducing collateral damage by 79.7% relative to direct LLM execution (from 25.6% to 5.2%), at the cost of a modest sandbox-induced increase in mean time to recovery (approximately 8 s). Ablation studies confirm that each component contributes meaningfully to the safety-speed trade-off.

cs.DC↗