SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2208.02539

On the history of Lie brackets, crossed modules, and Lie-Rinehart algebras

Abstract

The aim here is to sketch the development of ideas related to brackets and similar concepts: Some purely group theoretical combinatorics due to Ph. Hall led to a proof of the Jacobi identity for the Whitehead product in homotopy theory. Whitehead introduced crossed modules to characterize a second relative homotopy group; guided by combinatorial group theory considerations, Reidemeister and Peiffer explored this kind of structure to develop normal forms for the decomposition of a 3-manifold; but crossed modules are also lurking behind a forgotten approach of Turing to the extension problem for groups: Turing concocted the obstruction 3-cocycle isolated later by Eilenberg-Mac Lane and already proved the Eilenberg-Mac Lane theorem to the effect that the vanishing of the class of that cocycle is equivalent to the existence of a solution for the corresponding extension problem. This Turing cocycle is related to what has come to be known as Teichmueller cocycle. There was a parallel development for Lie algebras including a forgotten paper by Goldberg and, likewise, for Lie-Rinehart algebras and Lie algebroids. Versions of Turing's theorem were discovered several times under such circumstances, and there is rarely a hint at the mutual relationship. Also, Lie-Rinehart algebras have for long occurred in the literature on differential algebra, at least implicitly.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Johannes Huebschmann. 2022-08-04. On the history of Lie brackets, crossed modules, and Lie-Rinehart algebras. https://doi.org/10.3934/jgm.2021009

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO