SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2208.09840

Teaching the Burrows-Wheeler Transform via the Positional Burrows-Wheeler Transform

Abstract

The Burrows-Wheeler Transform (BWT) is often taught in undergraduate courses on algorithmic bioinformatics, because it underlies the FM-index and thus important tools such as Bowtie and BWA. Its admirers consider the BWT a thing of beauty but, despite thousands of pages being written about it over nearly thirty years, to undergraduates seeing it for the first time it still often seems like magic. Some who persevere are later shown the Positional BWT (PBWT), which was published twenty years after the BWT. In this paper we argue that the PBWT should be taught {\em before} the BWT. We first use the PBWT's close relation to a right-to-left radix sort to explain how to use it as a fast and space-efficient index for {\em positional search} on a set of strings (that is, given a pattern and a position, quickly list the strings containing that pattern starting in that position). We then observe that {\em prefix search} (listing all the strings that start with the pattern) is an easy special case of positional search, and that prefix search on the suffixes of a single string is equivalent to {\em substring search} in that string (listing all the starting positions of occurrences of the pattern in the string). Storing na\"ively a PBWT of the suffixes of a string is space-{\em inefficient} but, in even reasonably small examples, most of its columns are nearly the same. It is not difficult to show that if we store a PBWT of the cyclic shifts of the string, instead of its suffixes, then all the columns are exactly the same -- and equal to the BWT of the string. Thus we can teach the BWT and the FM-index via the PBWT.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Travis Gagie, Giovanni Manzini, Marinella Sciortino. 2022-08-21. Teaching the Burrows-Wheeler Transform via the Positional Burrows-Wheeler Transform. https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.09840

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS