Minimum Coverage Instrumentation

Li Chen; Ellis Hoag; Kyungwoo Lee; Julian Mestre; Sergey Pupyrev

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2208.13907

Minimum Coverage Instrumentation

Li Chen·Ellis Hoag·Kyungwoo Lee·Julian Mestre·Sergey Pupyrev

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Modern compilers leverage block coverage profile data to carry out downstream profile-guided optimizations to improve the runtime performance and the size of a binary. Given a control-flow graph $G=(V, E)$ of a function in the binary, where nodes in $V$ correspond to basic blocks (sequences of instructions that are always executed sequentially) and edges in $E$ represent jumps in the control flow, the goal is to know for each block $u \in V$ whether $u$ was executed during a session. To this end, extra instrumentation code that records when a block is executed needs to be added to the binary. This extra code creates a time and space overhead, which one would like to minimize as much as possible. Motivated by this application, we study the Minimum Coverage Instrumentation problem, where the goal is to find a minimum size subset of blocks to instrument such that the coverage of the remaining blocks in the graph can be inferred from the coverage status of the instrumented subset. Our main result is an algorithm to find an optimal instrumentation strategy and to carry out the inference in $O(|E|)$ time. We also study variants of this basic problem in which we are interested in learning the coverage of edges instead of the nodes, or when we are only allowed to instrument edges instead of the nodes.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Li Chen, Ellis Hoag, Kyungwoo Lee, Julian Mestre, Sergey Pupyrev. 2022-08-29. Minimum Coverage Instrumentation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.13907

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗