Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2208.13936

Empirical Likelihood Inference of Variance Components in Linear Mixed-Effects Models

J. Zhang·W. Guo·J. S. Carpenter·Andrew Leroux·K. R. Merikangas·N. G. Martin·I. B. Hickie·H. Shou·H. Li
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Linear mixed-effects models are widely used in analyzing repeated measures data, including clustered and longitudinal data, where inferences of both fixed effects and variance components are of importance. Unlike the fixed effect inference that has been well studied, inference on the variance components is more challenging due to null value being on the boundary and the nuisance parameters of the fixed effects. Existing methods often require strong distributional assumptions on the random effects and random errors. In this paper, we develop empirical likelihood-based methods for the inference of the variance components in the presence of fixed effects. A nonparametric version of the Wilks' theorem for the proposed empirical likelihood ratio statistics for variance components is derived. We also develop an empirical likelihood test for multiple variance components related to a sequence of correlated outcomes. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed methods exhibit better type 1 error control than the commonly used likelihood ratio tests when the Gaussian distributional assumptions of the random effects are violated. We apply the methods to investigate the heritability of physical activity as measured by wearable device in the Australian Twin study and observe that such activity is heritable only in the quantile range from 0.375 to 0.514.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

J. Zhang, W. Guo, J. S. Carpenter, Andrew Leroux, K. R. Merikangas, N. G. Martin, I. B. Hickie, H. Shou, H. Li. 2022-08-30. Empirical Likelihood Inference of Variance Components in Linear Mixed-Effects Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.13936

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗