arXiv · 2209.13082
Static Knowledge vs. Dynamic Argumentation: A Dual Theory Based on Kripke Semantics
Abstract
This paper establishes a dual theory about knowledge and argumentation. Our idea is rooted at both epistemic logic and argumentation theory, and we aim to merge these two fields, not just in a superficial way but to thoroughly disclose the intrinsic relevance between knowledge and argumentation. Specifically, we define epistemic Kripke models and argument Kripke models as a dual pair, and then work out a two-way generation method between these two types of Kripke models. Such generation is rigorously justified by a duality theorem on modal formulae's invariance. We also provide realistic examples to demonstrate our generation, through which our framework's practical utility gets strongly advocated. We finally propose a philosophical thesis that knowledge is essentially dynamic, and we draw certain connection to Maxwell's demon as well as the well-known proverb "knowledge is power".
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Xinyu Wang, Momoka Fujieda. 2022-09-27. Static Knowledge vs. Dynamic Argumentation: A Dual Theory Based on Kripke Semantics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.13082
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.