SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2210.01897

The DAG Visit approach for Pebbling and I/O Lower Bounds

Abstract

We introduce the notion of an $r$-visit of a Directed Acyclic Graph DAG $G=(V,E)$, a sequence of the vertices of the DAG complying with a given rule $r$. A rule $r$ specifies for each vertex $v\in V$ a family of $r$-enabling sets of (immediate) predecessors: before visiting $v$, at least one of its enabling sets must have been visited. Special cases are the $r^{(top)}$-rule (or, topological rule), for which the only enabling set is the set of all predecessors and the $r^{(sin)}$-rule (or, singleton rule), for which the enabling sets are the singletons containing exactly one predecessor. The $r$-boundary complexity of a DAG $G$, $b_{r}\left(G\right)$, is the minimum integer $b$ such that there is an $r$-visit where, at each stage, for at most $b$ of the vertices yet to be visited an enabling set has already been visited. By a reformulation of known results, it is shown that the boundary complexity of a DAG $G$ is a lower bound to the pebbling number of the reverse DAG, $G^R$. Several known pebbling lower bounds can be cast in terms of the $r^{(sin)}$-boundary complexity. A visit partition technique for I/O lower bounds, which generalizes the $S$-partition I/O technique introduced by Hong and Kung in their classic paper "I/O complexity: The Red-Blue pebble game". The visit partition approach yields tight I/O bounds for some DAGs for which the $S$-partition technique can only yield an $\Omega(1)$ lower bound.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gianfranco Bilardi, Lorenzo De Stefani. 2022-10-04. The DAG Visit approach for Pebbling and I/O Lower Bounds. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01897

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS