Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2210.08994

Knowledge Representation for Conceptual, Motivational, and Affective Processes in Natural Language Communication

Seng-Beng Ho·Zhaoxia Wang·Boon-Kiat Quek·Erik Cambria
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Natural language communication is an intricate and complex process. The speaker usually begins with an intention and motivation of what is to be communicated, and what effects are expected from the communication, while taking into consideration the listener's mental model to concoct an appropriate sentence. The listener likewise has to interpret what the speaker means, and respond accordingly, also with the speaker's mental state in mind. To do this successfully, conceptual, motivational, and affective processes have to be represented appropriately to drive the language generation and understanding processes. Language processing has succeeded well with the big data approach in applications such as chatbots and machine translation. However, in human-robot collaborative social communication and in using natural language for delivering precise instructions to robots, a deeper representation of the conceptual, motivational, and affective processes is needed. This paper capitalizes on the UGALRS (Unified General Autonomous and Language Reasoning System) framework and the CD+ (Conceptual Representation Plus) representational scheme to illustrate how social communication through language is supported by a knowledge representational scheme that handles conceptual, motivational, and affective processes in a deep and general way. Though a small set of concepts, motivations, and emotions is treated in this paper, its main contribution is in articulating a general framework of knowledge representation and processing to link these aspects together in serving the purpose of natural language communication for an intelligent system.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Seng-Beng Ho, Zhaoxia Wang, Boon-Kiat Quek, Erik Cambria. 2022-09-26. Knowledge Representation for Conceptual, Motivational, and Affective Processes in Natural Language Communication. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.08994

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗