New data poison attacks on machine learning classifiers for mobile exfiltration

Miguel A. Ramirez; Sangyoung Yoon; Ernesto Damiani; Hussam Al Hamadi; Claudio Agostino Ardagna; Nicola Bena; Young-Ji Byon; Tae-Yeon Kim; Chung-Suk Cho; Chan Yeob Yeun

arXiv · 2210.11592

New data poison attacks on machine learning classifiers for mobile exfiltration

Miguel A. Ramirez·Sangyoung Yoon·Ernesto Damiani·Hussam Al Hamadi·Claudio Agostino Ardagna·Nicola Bena·Young-Ji Byon·Tae-Yeon Kim·Chung-Suk Cho·Chan Yeob Yeun

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Most recent studies have shown several vulnerabilities to attacks with the potential to jeopardize the integrity of the model, opening in a few recent years a new window of opportunity in terms of cyber-security. The main interest of this paper is directed towards data poisoning attacks involving label-flipping, this kind of attacks occur during the training phase, being the aim of the attacker to compromise the integrity of the targeted machine learning model by drastically reducing the overall accuracy of the model and/or achieving the missclassification of determined samples. This paper is conducted with intention of proposing two new kinds of data poisoning attacks based on label-flipping, the targeted of the attack is represented by a variety of machine learning classifiers dedicated for malware detection using mobile exfiltration data. With that, the proposed attacks are proven to be model-agnostic, having successfully corrupted a wide variety of machine learning models; Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest and KNN are some examples. The first attack is performs label-flipping actions randomly while the second attacks performs label flipping only one of the 2 classes in particular. The effects of each attack are analyzed in further detail with special emphasis on the accuracy drop and the misclassification rate. Finally, this paper pursuits further research direction by suggesting the development of a defense technique that could promise a feasible detection and/or mitigation mechanisms; such technique should be capable of conferring a certain level of robustness to a target model against potential attackers.

Explore related subjects

cs.CR cs.SY eess.SY

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Miguel A. Ramirez, Sangyoung Yoon, Ernesto Damiani, Hussam Al Hamadi, Claudio Agostino Ardagna, Nicola Bena, Young-Ji Byon, Tae-Yeon Kim, Chung-Suk Cho, Chan Yeob Yeun. 2022-10-20. New data poison attacks on machine learning classifiers for mobile exfiltration. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11592

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model, a privacy risk that matters in natural language processing (NLP), where training data can contain sensitive user text. This paper presents a controlled benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset. A TF-IDF + Logistic Regression pipeline and a fine-tuned DistilBERT classifier are compared under a loss-threshold MIA, with utility measured by development accuracy and macro F1. DistilBERT reached 0.9466 accuracy and 0.9460 macro F1 against 0.8756 and 0.8727 for Logistic Regression, yet both models leaked membership signal (Attack AUC 0.5615 and 0.5800, respectively). Two mitigations were tested. Stronger regularization reduced leakage for Logistic Regression at a visible utility cost, whereas fine-tuning DistilBERT for 2 epochs instead of 3 reduced leakage with negligible accuracy loss. Lightweight training adjustments can improve the privacy-utility trade-off without complex defenses.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

cs.CR↗