Complexity and Ramsey Largeness of Sets of Oracles Separating Complexity Classes

Alex Creiner; Stephen Jackson

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2210.12289

Complexity and Ramsey Largeness of Sets of Oracles Separating Complexity Classes

Alex Creiner·Stephen Jackson

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We prove two sets of results concerning computational complexity classes. The first concerns a variation of the random oracle hypothesis posed by Bennett and Gill after they showed that relative to a randomly chosen oracle, P not equal NP with probability 1. This hypothesis was quickly disproven in several ways, most famously in 1992 with the result that IP equals PSPACE, in spite of the classes being shown unequal with probability 1. Here we propose a variation of what it means to be ``large'' using the Ellentuck topology. In this new context, we demonstrate that the set of oracles separating NP and co-NP is not small, and obtain similar results for the separation of PSPACE from PH along with the separation of NP from BQP. We demonstrate that this version of the hypothesis turns it into a sufficient condition for unrelativized relationships, at least in the three cases considered here. Second, we example the descriptive complexity of the classes of oracles providing the separations for these various classes, and determine their exact placement in the Borel hierarchy.

Explore related subjects

math.LO cs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Alex Creiner, Stephen Jackson. 2022-10-21. Complexity and Ramsey Largeness of Sets of Oracles Separating Complexity Classes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.12289

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗

arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗

arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗