SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2211.02764

Signal Recovery With Multistage Tests And Without Sparsity Constraints

Abstract

A signal recovery problem is considered, where the same binary testing problem is posed over multiple, independent data streams. The goal is to identify all signals, i.e., streams where the alternative hypothesis is correct, and noises, i.e., streams where the null hypothesis is correct, subject to prescribed bounds on the classical or generalized familywise error probabilities. It is not required that the exact number of signals be a priori known, only upper bounds on the number of signals and noises are assumed instead. A decentralized formulation is adopted, according to which the sample size and the decision for each testing problem must be based only on observations from the corresponding data stream. A novel multistage testing procedure is proposed for this problem and is shown to enjoy a high-dimensional asymptotic optimality property. Specifically, it achieves the optimal, average over all streams, expected sample size, uniformly in the true number of signals, as the maximum possible numbers of signals and noises go to infinity at arbitrary rates, in the class of all sequential tests with the same global error control. In contrast, existing multistage tests in the literature are shown to achieve this high-dimensional asymptotic optimality property only under additional sparsity or symmetry conditions. These results are based on an asymptotic analysis for the fundamental binary testing problem as the two error probabilities go to zero. For this problem, unlike existing multistage tests in the literature, the proposed test achieves the optimal expected sample size under both hypotheses, in the class of all sequential tests with the same error control, as the two error probabilities go to zero at arbitrary rates. These results are further supported by simulation studies and extended to problems with non-iid data and composite hypotheses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yiming Xing, Georgios Fellouris. 2022-11-04. Signal Recovery With Multistage Tests And Without Sparsity Constraints. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02764

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME