SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2211.05293

Streaming Euclidean Max-Cut: Dimension vs Data Reduction

Abstract

Max-Cut is a fundamental problem that has been studied extensively in various settings. We design an algorithm for Euclidean Max-Cut, where the input is a set of points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, in the model of dynamic geometric streams, where the input $X\subseteq [\Delta]^d$ is presented as a sequence of point insertions and deletions. Previously, Frahling and Sohler [STOC 2005] designed a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm for the low-dimensional regime, i.e., it uses space $\exp(d)$. To tackle this problem in the high-dimensional regime, which is of growing interest, one must improve the dependence on the dimension $d$, ideally to space complexity $\mathrm{poly}(\epsilon^{-1} d \log\Delta)$. Lammersen, Sidiropoulos, and Sohler [WADS 2009] proved that Euclidean Max-Cut admits dimension reduction with target dimension $d' = \mathrm{poly}(\epsilon^{-1})$. Combining this with the aforementioned algorithm that uses space $\exp(d')$, they obtain an algorithm whose overall space complexity is indeed polynomial in $d$, but unfortunately exponential in $\epsilon^{-1}$. We devise an alternative approach of \emph{data reduction}, based on importance sampling, and achieve space bound $\mathrm{poly}(\epsilon^{-1} d \log\Delta)$, which is exponentially better (in $\epsilon$) than the dimension-reduction approach. To implement this scheme in the streaming model, we employ a randomly-shifted quadtree to construct a tree embedding. While this is a well-known method, a key feature of our algorithm is that the embedding's distortion $O(d\log\Delta)$ affects only the space complexity, and the approximation ratio remains $1+\epsilon$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Xiaoyu Chen, Shaofeng H. -C. Jiang, Robert Krauthgamer. 2022-11-10. Streaming Euclidean Max-Cut: Dimension vs Data Reduction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.05293

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS