Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2211.07185

Securing Access to Untrusted Services From TEEs with GateKeeper

Meni Orenbach·Bar Raveh·Alon Berkenstadt·Yan Michalevsky·Shachar Itzhaky·Mark Silberstein
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Applications running in Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) commonly use untrusted external services such as host File System. Adversaries may maliciously alter the normal service behavior to trigger subtle application bugs that would have never occurred under correct service operation, causing data leaks and integrity violations. Unfortunately, existing manual protections are incomplete and ad-hoc, whereas formally-verified ones require special expertise. We introduce GateKeeper, a framework to develop mitigations and vulnerability checkers for such attacks by leveraging lightweight formal models of untrusted services. With the attack seen as a violation of a services' functional correctness, GateKeeper takes a novel approach to develop a comprehensive model of a service without requiring formal methods expertise. We harness available testing suites routinely used in service development to tighten the model to known correct service implementation. GateKeeper uses the resulting model to automatically generate (1) a correct-by-construction runtime service validator in C that is linked with a trusted application and guards each service invocation to conform to the model; and (2) a targeted model-driven vulnerability checker for analyzing black-box applications. We evaluate GateKeeper on Intel SGX enclaves. We develop comprehensive models of a POSIX file system and OS synchronization primitives while using thousands of existing test suites to tighten their models to the actual Linux implementations. We generate the validator and integrate it with Graphene-SGX, and successfully protect unmodified Memcached and SQLite with negligible overheads. The generated vulnerability checker detects novel vulnerabilities in the Graphene-SGX protection layer and production applications.

Explore related subjects

cs.CR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Meni Orenbach, Bar Raveh, Alon Berkenstadt, Yan Michalevsky, Shachar Itzhaky, Mark Silberstein. 2022-11-14. Securing Access to Untrusted Services From TEEs with GateKeeper. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07185

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model, a privacy risk that matters in natural language processing (NLP), where training data can contain sensitive user text. This paper presents a controlled benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset. A TF-IDF + Logistic Regression pipeline and a fine-tuned DistilBERT classifier are compared under a loss-threshold MIA, with utility measured by development accuracy and macro F1. DistilBERT reached 0.9466 accuracy and 0.9460 macro F1 against 0.8756 and 0.8727 for Logistic Regression, yet both models leaked membership signal (Attack AUC 0.5615 and 0.5800, respectively). Two mitigations were tested. Stronger regularization reduced leakage for Logistic Regression at a visible utility cost, whereas fine-tuning DistilBERT for 2 epochs instead of 3 reduced leakage with negligible accuracy loss. Lightweight training adjustments can improve the privacy-utility trade-off without complex defenses.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

cs.CR↗