SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2211.11726

A Cut-Matching Game for Constant-Hop Expanders

Abstract

This paper extends and generalizes the well-known cut-matching game framework and provides a novel cut-strategy that produces constant-hop expanders. Constant-hop expanders are a significant strengthening of regular expanders with the additional guarantee that any demand can be (obliviously) routed along constant-hop flow-paths - in contrast to the $\Omega(\log n)$-hop paths in expanders. Cut-matching games for expanders are key tools for obtaining linear-time approximation algorithms for many hard problems, including finding (balanced or approximately-largest) sparse cuts, certifying the expansion of a graph by embedding an (explicit) expander, as well as computing expander decompositions, hierarchical cut decompositions, oblivious routings, multi-cuts, and multi-commodity flows. The cut-matching game of this paper is crucial in extending this versatile and powerful machinery to constant-hop and length-constrained expanders and has been already been extensively used. For example, as a key ingredient in several recent breakthroughs, including, computing constant-approximate $k$-commodity (min-cost) flows in $(m+k)^{1+\epsilon}$ time as well as the optimal constant-approximate deterministic worst-case fully-dynamic APSP-distance oracle - in all applications the constant-approximation factor directly traces to and crucially relies on the expanders from a cut-matching game guaranteeing constant-hop routing paths.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bernhard Haeupler, Jonas Huebotter, Mohsen Ghaffari. 2022-11-21. A Cut-Matching Game for Constant-Hop Expanders. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.11726

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS