SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2211.11860

Upper and Lower Bounds on the Smoothed Complexity of the Simplex Method

Abstract

The simplex method for linear programming is known to be highly efficient in practice, and understanding its performance from a theoretical perspective is an active research topic. The framework of smoothed analysis, first introduced by Spielman and Teng (JACM '04) for this purpose, defines the smoothed complexity of solving a linear program with $d$ variables and $n$ constraints as the expected running time when Gaussian noise of variance $\sigma^2$ is added to the LP data. We prove that the smoothed complexity of the simplex method is $O(\sigma^{-3/2} d^{13/4}\log^{7/4} n)$, improving the dependence on $1/\sigma$ compared to the previous bound of $O(\sigma^{-2} d^2\sqrt{\log n})$. We accomplish this through a new analysis of the \emph{shadow bound}, key to earlier analyses as well. Illustrating the power of our new method, we use our method to prove a nearly tight upper bound on the smoothed complexity of two-dimensional polygons. We also establish the first non-trivial lower bound on the smoothed complexity of the simplex method, proving that the \emph{shadow vertex simplex method} requires at least $\Omega \Big(\min \big(\sigma^{-1/2} d^{-1/2}\log^{-1/4} d,2^d \big) \Big)$ pivot steps with high probability. A key part of our analysis is a new variation on the extended formulation for the regular $2^k$-gon. We end with a numerical experiment that suggests this analysis could be further improved.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sophie Huiberts, Yin Tat Lee, Xinzhi Zhang. 2022-11-21. Upper and Lower Bounds on the Smoothed Complexity of the Simplex Method. https://doi.org/10.46298/theoretics.25.23

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS