Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2211.16216

Online Unrelated-Machine Load Balancing and Generalized Flow with Recourse

Ravishankar Krishnaswamy·Shi Li·Varun Suriyanarayana
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider the online unrelated-machine load balancing problem with recourse, where the algorithm is allowed to re-assign prior jobs. We give a $(2+\epsilon)$-competitive algorithm for the problem with $O_\epsilon(\log n)$ amortized recourse per job. This is the first $O(1)$-competitive algorithm for the problem with reasonable recourse, and the competitive ratio nearly matches the long-standing best-known offline approximation guarantee. We also show an $O(\log\log n/\log\log\log n)$-competitive algorithm for the problem with $O(1)$ amortized recourse. The best-known bounds from prior work are $O(\log\log n)$-competitive algorithms with $O(1)$ amortized recourse due to [GKS14], for the special case of the restricted assignment model. Along the way, we design an algorithm for the online generalized network flow problem (also known as network flow problem with gains) with recourse. In the problem, any edge $uv$ in the network has a gain parameter $\gamma_{uv} > 0$ and $\theta$-units of flow sent across $uv$ from $u$'s side becomes $\gamma_{uv} \theta$ units of flow on the $v$'th side. In the online problem, there is one sink, and sources come one by one. Upon arrival of a source, we need to send 1 unit flow from the source. A recourse occurs if we change the flow value of an edge. We give an online algorithm for the problem with recourse at most $O(1/\epsilon)$ times the optimum cost for the instance with capacities scaled by $\frac{1}{1+\epsilon}$. The $(1+\epsilon)$-factor improves upon the corresponding $(2+\epsilon)$-factor of [GKS14], which only works for the ordinary network flow problem. As an immediate corollary, we also give an improved algorithm for the online $b$-matching problem with reassignment costs.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ravishankar Krishnaswamy, Shi Li, Varun Suriyanarayana. 2022-11-29. Online Unrelated-Machine Load Balancing and Generalized Flow with Recourse. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16216

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗