SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2212.02883

Improved Approximation Schemes for (Un-)Bounded Subset-Sum and Partition

Abstract

We consider the SUBSET SUM problem and its important variants in this paper. In the SUBSET SUM problem, a (multi-)set $X$ of $n$ positive numbers and a target number $t$ are given, and the task is to find a subset of $X$ with the maximal sum that does not exceed $t$. It is well known that this problem is NP-hard and admits fully polynomial-time approximation schemes (FPTASs). In recent years, it has been shown that there does not exist an FPTAS of running time $\tilde\OO( 1/ε^{2-δ})$ for arbitrary small $δ>0$ assuming ($\min$,+)-convolution conjecture~\cite{bringmann2021fine}. However, the lower bound can be bypassed if we relax the constraint such that the task is to find a subset of $X$ that can slightly exceed the threshold $t$ by $ε$ times, and the sum of numbers within the subset is at least $1-\tilde\OO(ε)$ times the optimal objective value that respects the constraint. Approximation schemes that may violate the constraint are also known as weak approximation schemes. For the SUBSET SUM problem, there is a randomized weak approximation scheme running in time $\tilde\OO(n+ 1/ε^{5/3})$ [Mucha et al.'19]. For the special case where the target $t$ is half of the summation of all input numbers, weak approximation schemes are equivalent to approximation schemes that do not violate the constraint, and the best-known algorithm runs in $\tilde\OO(n+1/ε^{{3}/{2}})$ time [Bringmann and Nakos'21].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xiaoyu Wu, Lin Chen. 2022-12-06. Improved Approximation Schemes for (Un-)Bounded Subset-Sum and Partition. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.02883

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS