SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2301.03926

Video Surveillance System Incorporating Expert Decision-making Process: A Case Study on Detecting Calving Signs in Cattle

Abstract

Through a user study in the field of livestock farming, we verify the effectiveness of an XAI framework for video surveillance systems. The systems can be made interpretable by incorporating experts' decision-making processes. AI systems are becoming increasingly common in real-world applications, especially in fields related to human decision-making, and its interpretability is necessary. However, there are still relatively few standard methods for assessing and addressing the interpretability of machine learning-based systems in real-world applications. In this study, we examine the framework of a video surveillance AI system that presents the reasoning behind predictions by incorporating experts' decision-making processes with rich domain knowledge of the notification target. While general black-box AI systems can only present final probability values, the proposed framework can present information relevant to experts' decisions, which is expected to be more helpful for their decision-making. In our case study, we designed a system for detecting signs of calving in cattle based on the proposed framework and evaluated the system through a user study (N=6) with people involved in livestock farming. A comparison with the black-box AI system revealed that many participants referred to the presented reasons for the prediction results, and five out of six participants selected the proposed system as the system they would like to use in the future. It became clear that we need to design a user interface that considers the reasons for the prediction results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ryosuke Hyodo, Susumu Saito, Teppei Nakano, Makoto Akabane, Ryoichi Kasuga, Tetsuji Ogawa. 2023-01-10. Video Surveillance System Incorporating Expert Decision-making Process: A Case Study on Detecting Calving Signs in Cattle. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.03926

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

ShellVis: Sandboxed Live Programming for Shell Scripts

Live programming provides visibility to programmers by running and tracing programs as they are edited. However, for programs with potentially harmful side effects, liveness can turn mistakes into disasters. We propose enabling live programming in environments with side effects via sandboxing: confining effects to a simulation of the true environment. We apply sandboxed live programming in the challenging context of shell scripting: a ubiquitous and powerful---yet notoriously opaque and error-prone---tool. ShellVis provides line-by-line feedback on a shell script's run-time behavior, with file operations sandboxed via a safe overlay of the file system. A qualitative user evaluation finds ShellVis to be helpful to participants, replacing tedious existing practices and instilling confidence. Participant responses also reveal areas for future research, particularly bridging the gulf of execution alongside the gulf of evaluation. ShellVis serves as a case study of how sandboxing can bring live-programming techniques into the many real-world programming contexts where side effects are important.

cs.HC

Visual-Motion-Induced Modulation of Pedestrian Trajectories Using Spatially Distributed Multi-Display Signage in Public Spaces

Multi-display signage (MDS), now ubiquitous in urban environments, has the potential to influence human behavior and experience in public spaces. However, despite its unique capability to present spatially distributed dynamic visual stimuli, its current use is mainly limited to advertising. In this study, we propose a perception-based approach for laterally modulating pedestrian trajectories as a nonverbal means of guiding pedestrians in public spaces. The approach is motivated by vection, the illusion of self-motion, and uses laterally moving monochrome stripes, a standard stimulus in vection research, presented across spatially distributed displays to elicit postural responses that may bias pedestrian trajectories. We evaluated the approach through a controlled laboratory experiment and a real-world field deployment involving actual pedestrian flows in a national museum. The laboratory experiment examined whether the MDS setup induced trajectory shifts in the direction predicted by prior research on the behavioral effects of vection. The field deployment investigated whether comparable effects would emerge in aggregate pedestrian behavior during unconstrained movement under conditions closer to those of urban public spaces. In the laboratory, full-screen motion significantly biased walking trajectories in the direction of visual motion, whereas partial-stripe motion produced no significant directional effect. In the field deployment, opposing full-screen motion conditions produced direction-consistent differences in aggregate pedestrian positions. The field results, observed despite the substantial variability in real-world pedestrian flows, extend the controlled laboratory findings and provide ecologically valid evidence supporting practical MDS-based pedestrian modulation in public settings. The results further suggest that sufficient visual-motion coverage may be important.

cs.HC

How AI Coders Discuss, Disagree, and Reach Consensus: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Based Qualitative Coding

The utility of AI in multi-coder qualitative coding has been widely discussed, yet little empirical evidence exists to delineate the contexts in which it performs reliably. We address this gap by quantifying the effectiveness of multi-agent LLM coding across varied qualitative datasets, revealing key contextual and structural factors that mediate coding outcomes. We developed a literature-informed baseline pipeline that enables AI agents to independently code, debate, and reconcile disagreements. Results revealed that coding accuracy depends on factors such as codebook length, qualitative data similarity, and agent disagreement. Notably, intense and unresolved debates between agents led to higher accuracy. Our analysis showed that while LLMs emulate many human discussion behaviors, they lack adaptive responsiveness to context. From these findings, we offer design recommendations for building automated coding systems. Our open-source AI discussion dataset and methodological framework lay the groundwork for advancing the design of AI-mediated automated thematic analysis.

cs.HC