SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2301.04424

Riemannian Geometry and Molecular Similarity II: K\"ahler Quantization

Abstract

Shape-similarity between molecules is a tool used by chemists for virtual screening, with the goal of reducing the cost and duration of drug discovery campaigns. This paper reports an entirely novel shape descriptor as an alternative to the previously described RGMolSA descriptors \cite{cole2022riemannian}, derived from the theory of Riemannian geometry and K\"ahler quantization (KQMolSA). The treatment of a molecule as a series of intersecting spheres allows us to obtain the explicit \textit{Riemannian metric} which captures the geometry of the surface, which can in turn be used to calculate a Hermitian matrix $\mathbb{M}$ as a directly comparable surface representation. The potential utility of this method is demonstrated using a series of PDE5 inhibitors considered to have similar shape. The method shows promise in its capability to handle different conformers, and compares well to existing shape similarity methods. The code and data used to produce the results are available at: \url{https://github.com/RPirie96/KQMolSA}.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Daniel J. Cole, Stuart J. Hall, Thomas Murphy, Rachael Pirie. 2023-01-11. Riemannian Geometry and Molecular Similarity II: K\"ahler Quantization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.04424

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The $q$-deformed cross-ratio: modular invariants and Coxeter friezes

We introduce and study a scalar $q$-deformation of the cross-ratio on $\mathbb P^1(\mathbb Q)$. Our construction is based on the notion of $q$-deformed rational numbers due to Morier-Genoud and the author. The $q$-cross-ratio is invariant under $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$, while elements of determinant $-1$ of $\mathrm{PGL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ act by $q\mapsto q^{-1}$. A principal result is its relation to $q$-deformed Coxeter friezes associated with rational polygons. The expansion at $q=e^h$ yields an algebraically independent sequence of modular invariants and relative invariants, although this sequence does not separate modular orbits. We compute the first two nonconstant coefficients of this expansion explicitly.

math.DG

The Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in dimension five

We show that the sharp Euclidean isoperimetric inequality holds for domains in complete simply connected Riemannian $5$-manifolds of nonpositive sectional curvature, which establishes the Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in that dimension. The main step is a sharp inequality for constant-mean-curvature hypersurfaces, proved via integrals over pairs of boundary points, in the spirit of Banchoff-Pohl, together with an estimate for Jacobi fields along geodesic chords. The inequality persists for boundaries of isoperimetric regions in geodesic balls, whose mean curvature is constant only on the free part. An isoperimetric-profile argument, after Kleiner, completes the proof. Our method also gives a new proof in dimension $3$.

math.DG

On static manifolds with boundary admitting a nowhere-vanishing static potential

We study complete static manifolds with boundary admitting a nowhere-vanishing static potential. Our main result shows that, under a natural lower bound relating the scalar curvature and the boundary mean curvature, a simple static manifold with boundary must in fact have positive scalar curvature, negative boundary mean curvature, and be compact; we also obtain explicit relations and estimates involving the volume of the manifold and the geometry of its boundary. In the scalar-flat case, we prove global splitting and Ricci-flat rigidity results, including for disconnected boundary, while in the negative scalar curvature case we establish a sharp mean-curvature bound and characterize the equality case by an exponential warped-product structure. The proofs rely essentially on the study of the associated Einstein manifold. In appendix we derive several identities for static manifolds with boundary and discuss the associated Einstein manifold technique in the boundaryless setting.

math.DG