Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2301.04630

ShadowNav: Crater-Based Localization for Nighttime and Permanently Shadowed Region Lunar Navigation

Abhishek Cauligi·R. Michael Swan·Masahiro Ono·Shreyansh Daftry·John Elliott·Larry Matthies·Deegan Atha
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

There has been an increase in interest in missions that drive significantly longer distances per day than what has currently been performed. Further, some of these proposed missions require autonomous driving and absolute localization in darkness. For example, the Endurance A mission proposes to drive 1200km of its total traverse at night. The lack of natural light available during such missions limits what can be used as visual landmarks and the range at which landmarks can be observed. In order for planetary rovers to traverse long ranges, onboard absolute localization is critical to the ability of the rover to maintain its planned trajectory and avoid known hazardous regions. Currently, to accomplish absolute localization, a ground in the loop (GITL) operation is performed wherein a human operator matches local maps or images from onboard with orbital images and maps. This GITL operation limits the distance that can be driven in a day to a few hundred meters, which is the distance that the rover can maintain acceptable localization error via relative methods. Previous work has shown that using craters as landmarks is a promising approach for performing absolute localization on the moon during the day. In this work we present a method of absolute localization that utilizes craters as landmarks and matches detected crater edges on the surface with known craters in orbital maps. We focus on a localization method based on a perception system which has an external illuminator and a stereo camera. We evaluate (1) both monocular and stereo based surface crater edge detection techniques, (2) methods of scoring the crater edge matches for optimal localization, and (3) localization performance on simulated Lunar surface imagery at night. We demonstrate that this technique shows promise for maintaining absolute localization error of less than 10m required for most planetary rover missions.

Explore related subjects

cs.ROcs.CV

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Abhishek Cauligi, R. Michael Swan, Masahiro Ono, Shreyansh Daftry, John Elliott, Larry Matthies, Deegan Atha. 2023-01-11. ShadowNav: Crater-Based Localization for Nighttime and Permanently Shadowed Region Lunar Navigation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.04630

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗