Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2301.05022

Progress on the study of the Ginibre ensembles II: GinOE and GinSE

Sung-Soo Byun·Peter J. Forrester
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This is part II of a review relating to the three classes of random non-Hermitian Gaussian matrices introduced by Ginibre in 1965. While part I restricted attention to the GinUE (Ginibre unitary ensemble) case of complex elements, in this part the cases of real elements (GinOE, denoting Ginibre orthogonal ensemble) and quaternion elements represented as $2 \times 2$ complex blocks (GinSE, denoting Ginibre symplectic ensemble) are considered. The eigenvalues of both GinOE and GinSE form Pfaffian point processes, which are more complicated than the determinantal point processes resulting from GinUE. Nevertheless, many of the obstacles that have slowed progress on the development of traditional aspects of the theory have now been overcome, while new theoretical aspects and new applications have been identified. This permits a comprehensive account of themes addressed too in the complex case: eigenvalue probability density functions and correlation functions, limit formulas for correlation functions, fluctuation formulas, sum rules, gap probabilities and eigenvector statistics, among others. Distinct from the complex case is the need to develop a theory of skew orthogonal polynomials corresponding to the skew inner product associated with the Pfaffian. Another distinct theme is the statistics of real eigenvalues, which is unique to GinOE. These appear in a number of applications of the theory, coming from areas as diverse as diffusion processes and persistence in statistical physics, topologically driven parametric energy level crossings for certain quantum dots, and equilibria counting for a system of random nonlinear differential equations.

Explore related subjects

math-phmath.MPmath.PR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sung-Soo Byun, Peter J. Forrester. 2023-01-12. Progress on the study of the Ginibre ensembles II: GinOE and GinSE. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.05022

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗