SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2301.05460

Quick Minimization of Tardy Processing Time on a Single Machine

Abstract

We consider the problem of minimizing the total processing time of tardy jobs on a single machine. This is a classical scheduling problem, first considered by [Lawler and Moore 1969], that also generalizes the Subset Sum problem. Recently, it was shown that this problem can be solved efficiently by computing $(\max,\min)$-skewed-convolutions. The running time of the resulting algorithm is equivalent, up to logarithmic factors, to the time it takes to compute a $(\max,\min)$-skewed-convolution of two vectors of integers whose sum is $O(P)$, where $P$ is the sum of the jobs' processing times. We further improve the running time of the minimum tardy processing time computation by introducing a job ``bundling'' technique and achieve a $\tilde{O}\left(P^{2-1/\alpha}\right)$ running time, where $\tilde{O}\left(P^\alpha\right)$ is the running time of a $(\max,\min)$-skewed-convolution of vectors of size $P$. This results in a $\tilde{O}\left(P^{7/5}\right)$ time algorithm for tardy processing time minimization, an improvement over the previously known $\tilde{O}\left(P^{5/3}\right)$ time algorithm.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Baruch Schieber, Pranav Sitaraman. 2023-01-13. Quick Minimization of Tardy Processing Time on a Single Machine. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.05460

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS