SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2302.00469

Regression adjustment in completely randomized experiments with many covariates

Abstract

This paper investigates estimation and inference for average treatment effects in completely randomized experiments when researchers observe potentially many covariates. Within Neyman's (1923) design-based framework, allowing the number of covariates to grow more slowly than the sample size, we demonstrate that a cross-fitted regression adjustment estimator--adapted from Aronow and Middleton (2013)--exhibits more favorable asymptotic properties than existing alternatives, such as Lin's (2013) regression adjustment estimator and the bias-corrected estimator of Lei and Ding (2021). For inference, we derive the first- and second-order terms in the stochastic expansions of regression-adjusted estimators, analyze the higher-order behavior of existing inference procedures, and introduce a modified version of the HC3 standard error. The proposed methods extend naturally to stratified experiments with large strata. Simulation studies show that the cross-fitted estimator, in combination with the modified HC3, provides accurate point estimates and reliable size control across a wide range of data-generating processes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Harold D Chiang, Yukitoshi Matsushita, Taisuke Otsu. 2023-02-01. Regression adjustment in completely randomized experiments with many covariates. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00469

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM