SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2302.03809

Shur type comparison theorems for affine curves with application to lattice point estimates

Abstract

If $c, \overline c\colon [a,b]\to \mathbb R^2$ are two convex planar curve parameterized by affine arc length and $A\colon [a,b]\to [0,\infty)$ is the area bounded by the restriction $c\big|_{[a,s]}$ and the segment between $c(a)$ and $c(s)$ with $\overline A$ the corresponding function for $\overline c$, and the affine curvature of $c$ pointwise less than the affine curvature of $\overline c$. Then $A(s)\ge \overline A(s)$. Also for any point of a convex curve we define \emph{adapted affine coordinates} centered at the point and give sharp estimates on the coordinates of the curve in terms of bounds on the curvature. Proving these bounds involves generalizing classical comparison theorems of Strum-Liouville type to higher order and nonhomogenous equations. These estimates allow us to give sharp bounds on the areas of inscribed triangles in terms of affine curvature and the affine distance between the vertices. These inequalities imply upper bounds of the number of lattice points on a convex curve in terms of its affine arc length.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ralph Howard. 2023-02-08. Shur type comparison theorems for affine curves with application to lattice point estimates. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03809

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The $q$-deformed cross-ratio: modular invariants and Coxeter friezes

We introduce and study a scalar $q$-deformation of the cross-ratio on $\mathbb P^1(\mathbb Q)$. Our construction is based on the notion of $q$-deformed rational numbers due to Morier-Genoud and the author. The $q$-cross-ratio is invariant under $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$, while elements of determinant $-1$ of $\mathrm{PGL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ act by $q\mapsto q^{-1}$. A principal result is its relation to $q$-deformed Coxeter friezes associated with rational polygons. The expansion at $q=e^h$ yields an algebraically independent sequence of modular invariants and relative invariants, although this sequence does not separate modular orbits. We compute the first two nonconstant coefficients of this expansion explicitly.

math.DG

The Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in dimension five

We show that the sharp Euclidean isoperimetric inequality holds for domains in complete simply connected Riemannian $5$-manifolds of nonpositive sectional curvature, which establishes the Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in that dimension. The main step is a sharp inequality for constant-mean-curvature hypersurfaces, proved via integrals over pairs of boundary points, in the spirit of Banchoff-Pohl, together with an estimate for Jacobi fields along geodesic chords. The inequality persists for boundaries of isoperimetric regions in geodesic balls, whose mean curvature is constant only on the free part. An isoperimetric-profile argument, after Kleiner, completes the proof. Our method also gives a new proof in dimension $3$.

math.DG

On static manifolds with boundary admitting a nowhere-vanishing static potential

We study complete static manifolds with boundary admitting a nowhere-vanishing static potential. Our main result shows that, under a natural lower bound relating the scalar curvature and the boundary mean curvature, a simple static manifold with boundary must in fact have positive scalar curvature, negative boundary mean curvature, and be compact; we also obtain explicit relations and estimates involving the volume of the manifold and the geometry of its boundary. In the scalar-flat case, we prove global splitting and Ricci-flat rigidity results, including for disconnected boundary, while in the negative scalar curvature case we establish a sharp mean-curvature bound and characterize the equality case by an exponential warped-product structure. The proofs rely essentially on the study of the associated Einstein manifold. In appendix we derive several identities for static manifolds with boundary and discuss the associated Einstein manifold technique in the boundaryless setting.

math.DG