Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2302.05520

Synchrony/Asynchrony vs. Stationary/Mobile? The Latter is Superior...in Theory

Eli Gafni·Vasileios Zikas
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Like Asynchrony, Mobility of faults precludes consensus. Yet, a model M in which Consensus is solvable, has an analogue relaxed model in which Consensus is not solvable and for which we can ask, whether Consensus is solvable if the system initially behaves like the relaxed analogue model, but eventually morphs into M. We consider two relaxed analogues of M. The first is the traditional Asynchronous model, and the second to be defined, the Mobile analogue. While for some M we show that Consensus is not solvable in the Asynchronous analogue, it is solvable in all the Mobile analogues. Hence, from this perspective Mobility is superior to Asynchrony. The pie in the sky relationship we envision is: Consensus is solvable in M, if and only if binary Commit-Adopt is solvable in the mobile analogue. The ``only if'' is easy. Here we show case by case that the ``if'' holds for all the common faults types.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Eli Gafni, Vasileios Zikas. 2023-02-10. Synchrony/Asynchrony vs. Stationary/Mobile? The Latter is Superior...in Theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05520

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗