SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2302.05904

Transforming First-Year Calculus Teaching for Engineering Students -- Blocks with Field Specific Examples, Problems, and Exams

Abstract

Contribution: We demonstrate that it is feasible to include field specific problems in introductory mathematics courses to motivate engineering students. This is done in a way that still allows large parts of the course to be common to all students, ensuring economic viability. Background: Many first-year engineering students perceive mathematics courses as being too abstract and far from their chosen study programme. This may lead to a lack of motivation and effort, thus decreasing the learning outcomes. Intended outcomes: That engineering students recognize that the calculus and linear algebra courses are relevant for their future work within their specific field. This is intended to improve their learning outcomes. Application design: The courses have been restructured into smaller subunits, each of which has a corresponding workshop treating a real-world problem from the specific field of a given group of students. These workshops are developed in consultation with the relevant fields of study, and they are given a prominent role in the course for instance by forming the basis for the oral exams. Findings: Based on the feedback from students, we find that inclusion of field specific problems does help to highlight the applicability and importance of mathematics in engineering. When implementing such a solution, however, there are a number of challenges to keep in mind.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

René Bødker Christensen, Bettina Dahl, Lisbeth Fajstrup. 2023-02-12. Transforming First-Year Calculus Teaching for Engineering Students -- Blocks with Field Specific Examples, Problems, and Exams. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05904

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO