SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2302.06846

Scheduling Coflows for Minimizing the Makespan in Identical Parallel Networks

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of technology, parallel computing applications have become increasingly popular and are commonly executed in large data centers. These applications involve two phases: computation and communication, which are executed repeatedly to complete the work. However, due to the ever-increasing demand for computing power, large data centers are struggling to meet the massive communication demands. To address this problem, coflow has been proposed as a networking abstraction that captures communication patterns in data-parallel computing frameworks. This paper focuses on the coflow scheduling problem in identical parallel networks, where the primary objective is to minimize the makespan, which is the maximum completion time of coflows. It is considered one of the most significant $\mathcal{NP}$-hard problems in large data centers. In this paper, we consider two problems: flow-level scheduling and coflow-level scheduling. In the flow-level scheduling problem, distinct flows can be transferred through different network cores, whereas in the coflow-level scheduling problem, all flows must be transferred through the same network core. To address the flow-level scheduling problem, this paper proposes two algorithms: a $(3-\tfrac{2}{m})$-approximation algorithm and a $(\tfrac{8}{3}-\tfrac{2}{3m})$-approximation algorithm, where $m$ represents the number of network cores. For the coflow-level scheduling problem, this paper proposes a $(2m)$-approximation algorithm. Finally, we conduct simulations on our proposed algorithm and Weaver's algorithm, as presented in Huang \textit{et al.} (2020) in the 2020 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS). We also validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms on heterogeneous parallel networks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Chi-Yeh Chen, Jun Chen. 2023-02-14. Scheduling Coflows for Minimizing the Makespan in Identical Parallel Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06846

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS