SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2303.08253

R2 Loss: Range Restriction Loss for Model Compression and Quantization

Abstract

Model quantization and compression is widely used techniques to reduce usage of computing resource at inference time. While state-of-the-art works have been achieved reasonable accuracy with higher bit such as 4bit or 8bit, but still it is challenging to quantize/compress a model further, e.g., 1bit or 2bit. To overcome the challenge, we focus on outliers in weights of a pre-trained model which disrupt effective lower bit quantization and compression. In this work, we propose Range Restriction Loss (R2-Loss) for building lower bit quantization and compression friendly models by removing outliers from weights during pre-training. By effectively restricting range of weights, we mold the overall distribution into a tight shape to ensure high quantization bit resolution, therefore allowing model compression and quantization techniques can to utilize their limited numeric representation powers better. We introduce three different, L-inf R2-Loss, its extension Margin R2-Loss and a new Soft-Min-MaxR2-Loss to be used as an auxiliary loss during full-precision model training. These R2-Loss can be used in different cases such as L-inf and Margin R2-Loss would be effective for symmetric quantization, while Soft-Min-Max R2-Loss shows better performance for model compression. In our experiment, R2-Loss improves lower bit quantization accuracy with state-of-the-art post-training quantization (PTQ), quantization-aware training (QAT), and model compression techniques. With R2-Loss, MobileNet-V2 2bit weight and 8bit activation PTQ, MobileNet-V1 2bit weight and activation QAT, ResNet18 1bit weight compression are improved to 59.49% from 50.66%, 59.05% from 55.96%, and 52.58% from 45.54%, respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Arnav Kundu, Chungkuk Yoo, Srijan Mishra, Minsik Cho, Saurabh Adya. 2023-03-14. R2 Loss: Range Restriction Loss for Model Compression and Quantization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08253

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG