SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2303.12768

Almost-Optimal Sublinear Additive Spanners

Abstract

Given an undirected unweighted graph $G = (V, E)$ on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, a subgraph $H\subseteq G$ is a spanner of $G$ with stretch function $f: \mathbb{R}_+ \rightarrow \mathbb{R}_+$, if for every pair $s, t$ of vertices in $V$, $\text{dist}_{H}(s, t)\le f(\text{dist}_{G}(s, t))$. When $f(d) = d + o(d)$, $H$ is called a sublinear additive spanner; when $f(d) = d + o(n)$, $H$ is called an \emph{additive spanner}, and $f(d) - d$ is usually called the \emph{additive stretch} of $H$. As our primary result, we show that for any constant $\delta>0$ and constant integer $k\geq 2$, every graph on $n$ vertices has a sublinear additive spanner with stretch function $f(d)=d+O(d^{1-1/k})$ and $O\big(n^{1+\frac{1+\delta}{2^{k+1}-1}}\big)$ edges. When $k = 2$, this improves upon the previous spanner construction with stretch function $f(d) = d + O(d^{1/2})$ and $\tilde{O}(n^{1+3/17})$ edges; for any constant integer $k\geq 3$, this improves upon the previous spanner construction with stretch function $f(d) = d + O(d^{1-1/k})$ and $O\bigg(n^{1+\frac{(3/4)^{k-2}}{7 - 2\cdot (3/4)^{k-2}}}\bigg)$ edges. Most importantly, the size of our spanners almost matches the lower bound of $\Omega\big(n^{1+\frac{1}{2^{k+1}-1}}\big)$, which holds for all compression schemes achieving the same stretch function. As our second result, we show a new construction of additive spanners with stretch $O(n^{0.403})$ and $\tilde{O}(n)$ edges, which slightly improves upon the previous stretch bound of $O(n^{3/7+\varepsilon})$ achieved by linear-size spanners. An additional advantage of our spanner is that it admits a subquadratic construction runtime of $\tilde{O}(m + n^{13/7})$, while the previous construction requires all-pairs shortest paths computation which takes $O(\min\{mn, n^{2.373}\})$ time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zihan Tan, Tianyi Zhang. 2023-03-22. Almost-Optimal Sublinear Additive Spanners. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12768

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS