SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2303.17458

On Indestructible Strongly Guessing Models

Abstract

In \cite{MV} we defined and proved the consistency of the principle ${\rm GM}^+(\omega_3,\omega_1)$ which implies that many consequences of strong forcing axioms hold simultaneously at $\omega_2$ and $\omega_3$. In this paper we formulate a strengthening of ${\rm GM}^+(\omega_3,\omega_1)$ that we call ${\rm SGM}^+(\omega_3,\omega_1)$. We also prove, modulo the consistency of two supercompact cardinals, that ${\rm SGM}^+(\omega_3,\omega_1)$ is consistent with ZFC. In addition to all the consequences of ${\rm GM}^+(\omega_3,\omega_1)$, the principle ${\rm SGM}^+(\omega_3,\omega_1)$, together with some mild cardinal arithmetic assumptions that hold in our model, implies that any forcing that adds a new subset of $\omega_2$ either adds a real or collapses some cardinal. This gives a partial answer to a question of Abraham \cite{AvrahamPhD} and extends a previous result of Todor\v{c}evi\'{c} \cite{Todorcevic82} in this direction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Rahman Mohammadpour, Boban Velickovic. 2023-03-30. On Indestructible Strongly Guessing Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17458

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO