The Bit Complexity of Efficient Continuous Optimization

Mehrdad Ghadiri; Richard Peng; Santosh S. Vempala

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2304.02124

The Bit Complexity of Efficient Continuous Optimization

Mehrdad Ghadiri·Richard Peng·Santosh S. Vempala

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We analyze the bit complexity of efficient algorithms for fundamental optimization problems, such as linear regression, $p$-norm regression, and linear programming (LP). State-of-the-art algorithms are iterative, and in terms of the number of arithmetic operations, they match the current time complexity of multiplying two $n$-by-$n$ matrices (up to polylogarithmic factors). However, previous work has typically assumed infinite precision arithmetic, and due to complicated inverse maintenance techniques, the actual running times of these algorithms are unknown. To settle the running time and bit complexity of these algorithms, we demonstrate that a core common subroutine, known as \emph{inverse maintenance}, is backward-stable. Additionally, we show that iterative approaches for solving constrained weighted regression problems can be accomplished with bounded-error pre-conditioners. Specifically, we prove that linear programs can be solved approximately in matrix multiplication time multiplied by polylog factors that depend on the condition number $\kappa$ of the matrix and the inner and outer radius of the LP problem. $p$-norm regression can be solved approximately in matrix multiplication time multiplied by polylog factors in $\kappa$. Lastly, linear regression can be solved approximately in input-sparsity time multiplied by polylog factors in $\kappa$. Furthermore, we present results for achieving lower than matrix multiplication time for $p$-norm regression by utilizing faster solvers for sparse linear systems.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.NA math.NA

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Mehrdad Ghadiri, Richard Peng, Santosh S. Vempala. 2023-04-04. The Bit Complexity of Efficient Continuous Optimization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02124

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗