Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2304.02365

Modeling still matters: a surprising instance of catastrophic floating point errors in mathematical biology and numerical methods for ODEs

Cordula Reisch·Hendrik Ranocha
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We guide the reader on a journey through mathematical modeling and numerical analysis, emphasizing the crucial interplay of both disciplines. Targeting undergraduate students with basic knowledge in dynamical systems and numerical methods for ordinary differential equations, we explore a model from mathematical biology where numerical methods fail badly due to catastrophic floating point errors. We analyze the reasons for this behavior by studying the steady states of the model and use the theory of invariants to develop an alternative model that is suited for numerical simulations. Our story intends to motivate combining analytical and numerical knowledge, even in cases where the world looks fine at first sight. We have set up an online repository containing an interactive notebook with all numerical experiments to make this study fully reproducible and useful for classroom teaching.

Explore related subjects

math.HOcs.NAmath.NA

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Cordula Reisch, Hendrik Ranocha. 2023-04-05. Modeling still matters: a surprising instance of catastrophic floating point errors in mathematical biology and numerical methods for ODEs. https://doi.org/10.1137/23m1563967

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗