SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2304.03191

Krylov Methods are (nearly) Optimal for Low-Rank Approximation

Abstract

We consider the problem of rank-$1$ low-rank approximation (LRA) in the matrix-vector product model under various Schatten norms: $$ \min_{\|u\|_2=1} \|A (I - u u^\top)\|_{\mathcal{S}_p} , $$ where $\|M\|_{\mathcal{S}_p}$ denotes the $\ell_p$ norm of the singular values of $M$. Given $\varepsilon>0$, our goal is to output a unit vector $v$ such that $$ \|A(I - vv^\top)\|_{\mathcal{S}_p} \leq (1+\varepsilon) \min_{\|u\|_2=1}\|A(I - u u^\top)\|_{\mathcal{S}_p}. $$ Our main result shows that Krylov methods (nearly) achieve the information-theoretically optimal number of matrix-vector products for Spectral ($p=\infty$), Frobenius ($p=2$) and Nuclear ($p=1$) LRA. In particular, for Spectral LRA, we show that any algorithm requires $\Omega\left(\log(n)/\varepsilon^{1/2}\right)$ matrix-vector products, exactly matching the upper bound obtained by Krylov methods [MM15, BCW22]. Our lower bound addresses Open Question 1 in [Woo14], providing evidence for the lack of progress on algorithms for Spectral LRA and resolves Open Question 1.2 in [BCW22]. Next, we show that for any fixed constant $p$, i.e. $1\leq p =O(1)$, there is an upper bound of $O\left(\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^{1/3}\right)$ matrix-vector products, implying that the complexity does not grow as a function of input size. This improves the $O\left(\log(n/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^{1/3}\right)$ bound recently obtained in [BCW22], and matches their $\Omega\left(1/\varepsilon^{1/3}\right)$ lower bound, to a $\log(1/\varepsilon)$ factor.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ainesh Bakshi, Shyam Narayanan. 2023-04-06. Krylov Methods are (nearly) Optimal for Low-Rank Approximation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03191

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS