SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2304.04445

Path-Reporting Distance Oracles with Logarithmic Stretch and Size O(n loglog n)

Abstract

Given an $n$-vertex undirected graph $G=(V,E,w)$, and a parameter $k\geq1$, a path-reporting distance oracle (or PRDO) is a data structure of size $S(n,k)$, that given a query $(u,v)\in V^2$, returns an $f(k)$-approximate shortest $u-v$ path $P$ in $G$ within time $q(k)+O(|P|)$. Here $S(n,k)$, $f(k)$ and $q(k)$ are arbitrary functions. A landmark PRDO due to Thorup and Zwick, with an improvement of Wulff-Nilsen, has $S(n,k)=O(k\cdot n^{1+\frac{1}{k}})$, $f(k)=2k-1$ and $q(k)=O(\log k)$. The size of this oracle is $\Omega(n\log n)$ for all $k$. Elkin and Pettie and Neiman and Shabat devised much sparser PRDOs, but their stretch was polynomially larger than the optimal $2k-1$. On the other hand, for non-path-reporting distance oracles, Chechik devised a result with $S(n,k)=O(n^{1+\frac{1}{k}})$, $f(k)=2k-1$ and $q(k)=O(1)$. In this paper we make a dramatic progress in bridging the gap between path-reporting and non-path-reporting distance oracles. We devise a PRDO with size $S(n,k)=O(\lceil\frac{k\log\log n}{\log n}\rceil\cdot n^{1+\frac{1}{k}})$, stretch $f(k)=O(k)$ and query time $q(k)=O(\log\lceil\frac{k\log\log n}{\log n}\rceil)$. We can also have size $O(n^{1+\frac{1}{k}})$, stretch $O(k\cdot\lceil\frac{k\log\log n}{\log n}\rceil)$ and query time $q(k)=O(\log\lceil\frac{k\log\log n}{\log n}\rceil)$. Our results on PRDOs are based on novel constructions of approximate distance preservers, that we devise in this paper. Specifically, we show that for any $\epsilon>0$, any $k=1,2,...$, and any graph $G$ and a collection $\mathcal{P}$ of $p$ vertex pairs, there exists a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate preserver with $O(\gamma(\epsilon,k)\cdot p+n\log k+n^{1+\frac{1}{k}})$ edges, where $\gamma(\epsilon,k)=(\frac{\log k}{\epsilon})^{O(\log k)}$. These new preservers are significantly sparser than the previous state-of-the-art approximate preservers due to Kogan and Parter.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Elkin, Idan Shabat. 2023-04-10. Path-Reporting Distance Oracles with Logarithmic Stretch and Size O(n loglog n). https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.04445

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS