Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2304.06043

A Deep Learning Approach Towards Generating High-fidelity Diverse Synthetic Battery Datasets

Janamejaya Channegowda·Vageesh Maiya·Chaitanya Lingaraj
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Recent surge in the number of Electric Vehicles have created a need to develop inexpensive energy-dense Battery Storage Systems. Many countries across the planet have put in place concrete measures to reduce and subsequently limit the number of vehicles powered by fossil fuels. Lithium-ion based batteries are presently dominating the electric automotive sector. Energy research efforts are also focussed on accurate computation of State-of-Charge of such batteries to provide reliable vehicle range estimates. Although such estimation algorithms provide precise estimates, all such techniques available in literature presume availability of superior quality battery datasets. In reality, gaining access to proprietary battery usage datasets is very tough for battery scientists. Moreover, open access datasets lack the diverse battery charge/discharge patterns needed to build generalized models. Curating battery measurement data is time consuming and needs expensive equipment. To surmount such limited data scenarios, we introduce few Deep Learning-based methods to synthesize high-fidelity battery datasets, these augmented synthetic datasets will help battery researchers build better estimation models in the presence of limited data. We have released the code and dataset used in the present approach to generate synthetic data. The battery data augmentation techniques introduced here will alleviate limited battery dataset challenges.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Janamejaya Channegowda, Vageesh Maiya, Chaitanya Lingaraj. 2023-04-09. A Deep Learning Approach Towards Generating High-fidelity Diverse Synthetic Battery Datasets. https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2023.3265359

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗