SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2304.06594

Solving Tensor Low Cycle Rank Approximation

Abstract

Large language models have become ubiquitous in modern life, finding applications in various domains such as natural language processing, language translation, and speech recognition. Recently, a breakthrough work [Zhao, Panigrahi, Ge, and Arora Arxiv 2023] explains the attention model from probabilistic context-free grammar (PCFG). One of the central computation task for computing probability in PCFG is formulating a particular tensor low rank approximation problem, we can call it tensor cycle rank. Given an $n \times n \times n$ third order tensor $A$, we say that $A$ has cycle rank-$k$ if there exists three $n \times k^2$ size matrices $U , V$, and $W$ such that for each entry in each \begin{align*} A_{a,b,c} = \sum_{i=1}^k \sum_{j=1}^k \sum_{l=1}^k U_{a,i+k(j-1)} \otimes V_{b, j + k(l-1)} \otimes W_{c, l + k(i-1) } \end{align*} for all $a \in [n], b \in [n], c \in [n]$. For the tensor classical rank, tucker rank and train rank, it has been well studied in [Song, Woodruff, Zhong SODA 2019]. In this paper, we generalize the previous ``rotation and sketch'' technique in page 186 of [Song, Woodruff, Zhong SODA 2019] and show an input sparsity time algorithm for cycle rank.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yichuan Deng, Yeqi Gao, Zhao Song. 2023-04-13. Solving Tensor Low Cycle Rank Approximation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06594

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS