Optimal Uncoordinated Unique IDs

Peter C. Dillinger; Martín Farach-Colton; Guido Tagliavini; Stefan Walzer

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2304.07109

Optimal Uncoordinated Unique IDs

Peter C. Dillinger·Martín Farach-Colton·Guido Tagliavini·Stefan Walzer

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the Uncoordinated Unique Identifiers Problem (UUIDP) there are $n$ independent instances of an algorithm $\mathcal{A}$ that generates IDs from a universe $\{1, \dots, m\}$, and there is an adversary that requests IDs from these instances. The goal is to design $\mathcal{A}$ such that it minimizes the probability that the same ID is ever generated twice across all instances, that is, minimizes the collision probability. Crucially, no communication between the instances of $\mathcal{A}$ is possible. Solutions to the UUIDP are often used as mechanisms for surrogate key generation in distributed databases and key-value stores. In spite of its practical relevance, we know of no prior theoretical work on the UUIDP. In this paper we initiate the systematic study of the UUIDP. We analyze both existing and novel algorithms for this problem, and evaluate their collision probability using worst-case analysis and competitive analysis, against oblivious and adaptive adversaries. In particular, we present an algorithm that is optimal in the worst case against oblivious adversaries, an algorithm that is at most a logarithmic factor away from optimal in the worst case against adaptive adversaries, and an algorithm that is optimal in the competitive sense against both oblivious and adaptive adversaries.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Peter C. Dillinger, Martín Farach-Colton, Guido Tagliavini, Stefan Walzer. 2023-04-14. Optimal Uncoordinated Unique IDs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07109

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗