arXiv · 2304.14575
A Critique of Czerwinski's "Separation of ${\rm PSPACE}$ and ${\rm EXP}$"
Abstract
Czerwinski's paper "Separation of ${\rm PSPACE}$ and ${\rm EXP}$" [Cze21] claims to prove that ${\rm PSPACE} \neq {\rm EXP}$ by showing there is no length-increasing polynomial-time reduction from a given ${\rm EXP}$-complete set to a given ${\rm PSPACE}$-complete set. However, in this critique, we show that there are fundamental flaws within the paper's approach and provide a counterexample to one of the paper's theorems, which makes the proposed proof that ${\rm PSPACE} \neq {\rm EXP}$ insufficient.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Ian Clingerman, Quan Luu. 2023-04-28. A Critique of Czerwinski's "Separation of ${\rm PSPACE}$ and ${\rm EXP}$". https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14575
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.