SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2305.00987

A novel algorithm can generate data to train machine learning models in conditions of extreme scarcity of real world data

Abstract

Training machine learning models requires large datasets. However, collecting, curating, and operating large and complex sets of real world data poses problems of costs, ethical and legal issues, and data availability. Here we propose a novel algorithm to generate large artificial datasets to train machine learning models in conditions of extreme scarcity of real world data. The algorithm is based on a genetic algorithm, which mutates randomly generated datasets subsequently used for training a neural network. After training, the performance of the neural network on a batch of real world data is considered a surrogate for the fitness of the generated dataset used for its training. As selection pressure is applied to the population of generated datasets, unfit individuals are discarded, and the fitness of the fittest individuals increases through generations. The performance of the data generation algorithm was measured on the Iris dataset and on the Breast Cancer Wisconsin diagnostic dataset. In conditions of real world data abundance, mean accuracy of machine learning models trained on generated data was comparable to mean accuracy of models trained on real world data (0.956 in both cases on the Iris dataset, p = 0.6996, and 0.9377 versus 0.9472 on the Breast Cancer dataset, p = 0.1189). In conditions of simulated extreme scarcity of real world data, mean accuracy of machine learning models trained on generated data was significantly higher than mean accuracy of comparable models trained on scarce real world data (0.9533 versus 0.9067 on the Iris dataset, p < 0.0001, and 0.8692 versus 0.7701 on the Breast Cancer dataset, p = 0.0091). In conclusion, this novel algorithm can generate large artificial datasets to train machine learning models, in conditions of extreme scarcity of real world data, or when cost or data sensitivity prevent the collection of large real world datasets.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Olivier Niel. 2023-05-01. A novel algorithm can generate data to train machine learning models in conditions of extreme scarcity of real world data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00987

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG