Approximating submodular $k$-partition via principal partition sequence

Karthekeyan Chandrasekaran; Weihang Wang

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2305.01069

Approximating submodular $k$-partition via principal partition sequence

Karthekeyan Chandrasekaran·Weihang Wang

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In submodular $k$-partition, the input is a non-negative submodular function $f$ defined over a finite ground set $V$ (given by an evaluation oracle) along with a positive integer $k$ and the goal is to find a partition of the ground set $V$ into $k$ non-empty parts $V_1, V_2, ..., V_k$ in order to minimize $\sum_{i=1}^k f(V_i)$. Narayanan, Roy, and Patkar (Journal of Algorithms, 1996) designed an algorithm for submodular $k$-partition based on the principal partition sequence and showed that the approximation factor of their algorithm is $2$ for the special case of graph cut functions (subsequently rediscovered by Ravi and Sinha (Journal of Operational Research, 2008)). In this work, we study the approximation factor of their algorithm for three subfamilies of submodular functions -- monotone, symmetric, and posimodular, and show the following results: 1. The approximation factor of their algorithm for monotone submodular $k$-partition is $4/3$. This result improves on the $2$-factor achievable via other algorithms. Moreover, our upper bound of $4/3$ matches the recently shown lower bound under polynomial number of function evaluation queries (Santiago, IWOCA 2021). Our upper bound of $4/3$ is also the first improvement beyond $2$ for a certain graph partitioning problem that is a special case of monotone submodular $k$-partition. 2. The approximation factor of their algorithm for symmetric submodular $k$-partition is $2$. This result generalizes their approximation factor analysis beyond graph cut functions. 3. The approximation factor of their algorithm for posimodular submodular $k$-partition is $2$. We also construct an example to show that the approximation factor of their algorithm for arbitrary submodular functions is $\Omega(n/k)$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Karthekeyan Chandrasekaran, Weihang Wang. 2023-05-01. Approximating submodular $k$-partition via principal partition sequence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01069

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗