Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2305.01080

Temporal Betweenness Centrality on Shortest Walks Variants

Mehdi Naima
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Betweenness centrality has been extensively studied since its introduction in 1977 as a measure of node importance in graphs. This measure has found use in various applications and has been extended to temporal graphs with time-labeled edges. Recent research by Buss et al. and Rymar et al. has shown that it is possible to compute the shortest path betweenness centrality of all nodes in a temporal graph in $O(n^3\,T^2)$ and $O(n^2\,m\,T^2)$ time, respectively, where $T$ is the maximum time, $m$ is the number of temporal edges, and $n$ is the number of nodes. These approaches considered paths that do not take into account contributions from intermediate temporal nodes. In this paper, we study the classical temporal betweenness centrality paths that we call \textit{passive} shortest paths, as well as an alternative variant that we call \textit{active} shortest paths, which takes into account contributions from all temporal nodes. We present an improved analysis of the running time of the classical algorithm for computing betweenness centrality of all nodes, reducing the time complexity to $O(n\,m\,T+ n^2\,T)$. Furthermore, for active paths, we show that the betweenness centrality can be computed in $O(n\,m\,T+ n^2\,T^2)$. We also show that our results hold for different shortest paths variants. Finally, we provide an open-source implementation of our algorithms and conduct experiments on several real-world datasets. We compare the results of the two variants on both the node and time dimensions of the temporal graph, and we also compare the temporal betweenness centrality to its static counterpart. Our experiments suggest that for the shortest foremost variant looking only at the first $10\%$ of the temporal interaction is a very good approximation for the overall top ranked nodes.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.SI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mehdi Naima. 2023-05-01. Temporal Betweenness Centrality on Shortest Walks Variants. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01080

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗