SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2305.01789

Multivariate Intrinsic Local Polynomial Regression on Isometric Riemannian Manifolds: Applications to Positive Definite Data

Abstract

The paper introduces a novel non-parametric Riemannian regression method using Isometric Riemannian Manifolds (IRMs). The proposed technique, Intrinsic Local Polynomial Regression on IRMs (ILPR-IRMs), enables global data mapping between Riemannian manifolds while preserving underlying geometries. The ILPR method is generalized to handle multivariate covariates on any Riemannian manifold and isometry. Specifically, for manifolds equipped with Euclidean Pullback Metrics (EPMs), a closed analytical formula is derived for the multivariate ILPR (ILPR-EPM). Asymptotic statistical properties of the ILPR-EPM for the multivariate local linear case are established, including a formula for the asymptotic bias, establishing estimator consistency. The paper showcases possible applications of the method by focusing on a group of Riemannian metrics on the Symmetric Positive Definite (SPD) manifold, which arises in machine learning and neuroscience. It is demonstrated that several metrics on the SPD manifold are EPMs, resulting in a closed analytical expression for the multivariate ILPR estimator on the SPD manifold. The paper evaluates the ILPR estimator's performance under two specific EPMs, Log-Cholesky and Log-Euclidean, on simulated data on the SPD manifold and compares it with extrinsic LPR using the Affine-Invariant when scaling the manifold and covariate dimension. The results show that the ILPR using the Log-Cholesky metric is computationally faster and provides a better trade-off between error and time than other metrics. Finally, the Log-Cholesky metric on the SPD manifold is employed to implement an efficient and intrinsic version of Rie-SNE for visualizing high-dimensional SPD data. The code for implementing ILPR-EPMs and other relevant calculations is available on the GitHub page.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ronaldo García Reyes, Ying Wang, Min Li, Marlis Ontiviero Ortega, Deirel Paz-Linares, Lídice Galán García, Pedro Antonio Valdez Sosa. 2023-05-02. Multivariate Intrinsic Local Polynomial Regression on Isometric Riemannian Manifolds: Applications to Positive Definite Data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01789

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME