Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2305.04376

A New Upper Bound on the Maximal Error Resilience of Interactive Error-Correcting Codes

Meghal Gupta·Rachel Yun Zhang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In an interactive error-correcting code (iECC), Alice and Bob engage in an interactive protocol with the goal of Alice communicating a message $x \in \{ 0, 1 \}^k$ to Bob in such a way that even if some fraction of the total communicated bits are corrupted, Bob can still determine $x$. It was shown in works by Gupta, Kalai, and Zhang (STOC 2022) and by Efremenko, Kol, Saxena, and Zhang (FOCS 2022) that there exist iECCs that are resilient to a larger fraction of errors than is possible in standard error-correcting codes without interaction. One major question in the study of iECCs is to determine the optimal error resilience achievable by an iECC. In the case of bit flip errors, it is known that an iECC can achieve $\frac14 + 10^{-5}$ error resilience (Efremenko, Kol, Saxena, and Zhang), while the best known upper bound is $\frac27 \approx 0.2857$ (Gupta, Kalai, and Zhang). In this work, we improve upon the upper bound, showing that no iECC can be resilient to more than $\frac{13}{47} \approx 0.2766$ fraction of errors.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Meghal Gupta, Rachel Yun Zhang. 2023-05-07. A New Upper Bound on the Maximal Error Resilience of Interactive Error-Correcting Codes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04376

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗