Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2305.05405

Sublogarithmic Approximation for Tollbooth Pricing on a Cactus

Andrzej Turko·Jarosław Byrka
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study an envy-free pricing problem, in which each buyer wishes to buy a shortest path connecting her individual pair of vertices in a network owned by a single vendor. The vendor sets the prices of individual edges with the aim of maximizing the total revenue generated by all buyers. Each customer buys a path as long as its cost does not exceed her individual budget. In this case, the revenue generated by her equals the sum of prices of edges along this path. We consider the unlimited supply setting, where each edge can be sold to arbitrarily many customers. The problem is to find a price assignment which maximizes vendor's revenue. A special case in which the network is a tree is known under the name of the tollbooth problem. Gamzu and Segev proposed a $\mathcal{O} \left( \frac{\log m}{\log \log m} \right)$-approximation algorithm for revenue maximization in that setting. Note that paths in a tree network are unique, and hence the tollbooth problem falls under the category of single-minded bidders, i.e., each buyer is interested in a single fixed set of goods. In this work we step out of the single-minded setting and consider more general networks that may contain cycles. We obtain an algorithm for pricing cactus shaped networks, namely networks in which each edge can belong to at most one simple cycle. Our result is a polynomial time $\mathcal{0} \left( \frac{\log m}{\log \log m}\right)$-approximation algorithm for revenue maximization in tollbooth pricing on a cactus graph. It builds upon the framework of Gamzu and Segev, but requires substantially extending its main ideas: the recursive decomposition of the graph, the dynamic programming for rooted instances and rounding the prices.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrzej Turko, Jarosław Byrka. 2023-05-09. Sublogarithmic Approximation for Tollbooth Pricing on a Cactus. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05405

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗