Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2305.05869

Finding Meaningful Distributions of ML Black-boxes under Forensic Investigation

Jiyi Zhang·Han Fang·Hwee Kuan Lee·Ee-Chien Chang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a poorly documented neural network model, we take the perspective of a forensic investigator who wants to find out the model's data domain (e.g. whether on face images or traffic signs). Although existing methods such as membership inference and model inversion can be used to uncover some information about an unknown model, they still require knowledge of the data domain to start with. In this paper, we propose solving this problem by leveraging on comprehensive corpus such as ImageNet to select a meaningful distribution that is close to the original training distribution and leads to high performance in follow-up investigations. The corpus comprises two components, a large dataset of samples and meta information such as hierarchical structure and textual information on the samples. Our goal is to select a set of samples from the corpus for the given model. The core of our method is an objective function that considers two criteria on the selected samples: the model functional properties (derived from the dataset), and semantics (derived from the metadata). We also give an algorithm to efficiently search the large space of all possible subsets w.r.t. the objective function. Experimentation results show that the proposed method is effective. For example, cloning a given model (originally trained with CIFAR-10) by using Caltech 101 can achieve 45.5% accuracy. By using datasets selected by our method, the accuracy is improved to 72.0%.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jiyi Zhang, Han Fang, Hwee Kuan Lee, Ee-Chien Chang. 2023-05-10. Finding Meaningful Distributions of ML Black-boxes under Forensic Investigation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05869

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗