SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2305.08434

Linear-Sized Sparsifiers via Near-Linear Time Discrepancy Theory

Abstract

Discrepancy theory provides powerful tools for producing higher-quality objects which "beat the union bound" in fundamental settings throughout combinatorics and computer science. However, this quality has often come at the price of more expensive algorithms. We introduce a new framework for bridging this gap, by allowing for the efficient implementation of discrepancy-theoretic primitives. Our framework repeatedly solves regularized optimization problems to low accuracy to approximate the partial coloring method of [Rot17], and simplifies and generalizes recent work of [JSS23] on fast algorithms for Spencer's theorem. In particular, our framework only requires that the discrepancy body of interest has exponentially large Gaussian measure and is expressible as a sublevel set of a symmetric, convex function. We combine this framework with new tools for proving Gaussian measure lower bounds to give improved algorithms for a variety of sparsification and coloring problems. As a first application, we use our framework to obtain an $\widetilde{O}(m \cdot \epsilon^{-3.5})$ time algorithm for constructing an $\epsilon$-approximate spectral sparsifier of an $m$-edge graph, matching the sparsity of [BSS14] up to constant factors and improving upon the $\widetilde{O}(m \cdot \epsilon^{-6.5})$ runtime of [LeeS17]. We further give a state-of-the-art algorithm for constructing graph ultrasparsifiers and an almost-linear time algorithm for constructing linear-sized degree-preserving sparsifiers via discrepancy theory; in the latter case, such sparsifiers were not known to exist previously. We generalize these results to their analogs in sparsifying isotropic sums of positive semidefinite matrices. Finally, to demonstrate the versatility of our technique, we obtain a nearly-input-sparsity time constructive algorithm for Spencer's theorem (where we recover a recent result of [JSS23]).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Arun Jambulapati, Victor Reis, Kevin Tian. 2023-05-15. Linear-Sized Sparsifiers via Near-Linear Time Discrepancy Theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08434

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS